ATR Trailing Stop Strategy by ceyhun: fee impact by timeframe — 30m 100% vs 15m 34%

We ran all 784 settings of ATR Trailing Stop Strategy by ceyhun on BTC, ETH, SOL and XRP across 15m, 30m, 1h and 4h over the past 90 days, with the 0.11% fee per trade included. The clearest pattern was timeframe.

Where it worked best: BTC 30m, where 100% of settings (49 of 49) ended positive after fees.

ATR Trailing Stop Strategy by ceyhun BTC 30m

Why timeframe: fees

Every trade pays 0.11%, so the more often a setting trades, the more the fee takes out of its result. 15m: settings averaged 209 trades, so fees took about 23.0 percentage points, and 34% of the settings that were positive before fees stayed positive after. 30m: settings averaged 94 trades, so fees took about 10.4 percentage points, and 100% of the settings that were positive before fees stayed positive after. 1h: settings averaged 53 trades, so fees took about 5.8 percentage points, and 58% of the settings that were positive before fees stayed positive after. 4h: settings averaged 13 trades, so fees took about 1.4 percentage points, and 100% of the settings that were positive before fees stayed positive after.

Settings positive after fees, by market

BTCETHSOLXRP
15m0 / 490 / 490 / 4949 / 49
30m49 / 4949 / 4949 / 4949 / 49
1h14 / 4914 / 4928 / 4949 / 49
4h0 / 490 / 4949 / 490 / 49

Highest setting combination over the past 90 days

SOL 30m: +40.42% with 84 trades — settings are ๐Ÿ”’ unlocked in PRO

How the default did

The TradingView default (5 · 0.5 · 10 · 3) on BTC 30m returned +18.78% with 99 trades; 0 of 49 setting combinations under the same conditions did better than the default.

The weakest combination was BTC 15m, with 0 of 49 settings positive.

Related posts

More ATR Trailing Stop posts · More 30m posts

See the full indicator analysis — free →

Past 90-day results, 0.11% fee per trade included, not a prediction.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stochastic + RSI, Double Strategy: 49 settings · BTC·ETH·SOL·XRP · 15m–4h · last 90 days (2026-09-29)

Image
Of 784 setting combinations, 278 ended above zero after the 0.11% fee per trade. Indicator analysis · BTC 15m Indicator analysis · ETH 1h TradingView default (14 · 3 · 3 · 80 · 20 · 14 · 70 · 30) on BTC 15m: -8.80% · 28 trades Highest 3 setting combinations over the past 90 days XRP 1h (๐Ÿ”’ PRO): +62.81% · 8 trades XRP 1h (๐Ÿ”’ PRO): +62.81% · 8 trades XRP 1h (๐Ÿ”’ PRO): +61.94% · 10 trades Lowest 3 setting combinations over the past 90 days ETH 1h (๐Ÿ”’ PRO): -68.06% · 5 trades ETH 1h (๐Ÿ”’ PRO): -67.85% · 5 trades ETH 1h (๐Ÿ”’ PRO): -67.85% · 5 trades By timeframe 15m: 106 of 196 settings across BTC, ETH, SOL and XRP ended above zero after fees; ETH had the largest share with 41 of 49. 30m: 57 of 196 settings across BTC, ETH, SOL and XRP ended above zero after fees; XRP had the largest share with 32 of 49. 1h: 108 of 196 settings across BTC, ETH, SOL and XRP ended above zero after fees; BTC had the largest share with 46 of 49. 4h: 7 of 196 settings across BTC, ETH, SOL and XRP ended above...
Read more

This Week's Most Improved TradingView Strategies: Top 5 (1h)

Image
We recomputed 50,144 setting combinations of the strategy scripts on BTC, ETH, SOL and XRP across 15m to 4h, over the past 90 days with the 0.11% fee per trade included, and compared each script with 2026-09-30 (7 days earlier). Strategies that improved BEST Supertrend Strategy: 60% → 64% of settings positive (+4 points) Bollinger + RSI, Double Strategy (by ChartArt) v1.1: 39% → 40% of settings positive (+1 points) EMA Slope + EMA Cross Strategy (by ChartArt): 13% → 14% of settings positive (+1 points) Bollinger + RSI, Double Strategy Long-Only (by ChartArt) v1.2: 71% → 72% of settings positive (+1 points) Common thread: 1h Across the scripts that improved, the share of positive settings changed like this by timeframe. 15m: 48% → 48%. 30m: 64% → 67%. 1h: 73% → 77%. 4h: 32% → 34%. Highest share of positive settings this week Advanced Ichimoku Clouds Strategy Long and Short: 100% of settings positive Ichimoku TK Cross > EMA200 Crypto Strategy: 99% of settings positive Donchain BO:...
Read more

BB Best Settings for 4h: Default vs Top Settings Backtested (Fees Included)

Image
BB (Bollinger Bands) behaved very differently by timeframe. Over the past 90 days, 90% of setting combinations finished positive after fees on 4h, but only 11% did on 15m. We ran all 1,400 setting combinations on 10 coins (BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, BNB, DOGE, ADA, LINK, SUI and HYPE) across 15m, 30m, 1h and 4h, with a 0.11% fee taken out of every trade. The figures in this post are as of 2026-10-17, and every result is recomputed nightly with fresh data. What does BB actually measure? Bollinger Bands (BB) are a volatility tool developed by John Bollinger. The middle line is a simple moving average of the close, and the upper and lower bands sit a multiple of the standard deviation of the close above and below it. TradingView's defaults are a length of 20 and a multiplier of 2. The bands widen when volatility rises and tighten when the market calms down. A touch of the lower band means price has stretched further below its recent average than usual. That makes it a common trigger for ...
Read more